Game review
The Bathhouse | 地獄銭湯 Restored Edition
6 / 10
- Developer
- Chilla's Art
- Publisher
- Chilla's Art
- Released
- 9 August 2024
- Platforms
- Windows
- Genre
- Japanese horror job simulator
- Monetisation
- One-time purchase, no in-game store or additional currency purchases
- Players
- Single-player only
The short version
The Bathhouse Restored Edition rebuilds one of Chilla's Art's earlier cult horror job-sims from the ground up, casting players as a bathhouse attendant whose ordinary work shifts gradually reveal something far stranger and more sinister beneath the surface. Reviewers who have followed the prolific Japanese horror studio's catalogue closely are unusually enthusiastic, with several calling this remake the developer's best work to date, praising a more fully realised narrative and a visual overhaul that substantially improves on the original. Set against that enthusiasm is a real, specific, and widely reported problem: this small-scale horror game runs demandingly poorly, with reviewers reporting significant stuttering, frame drops, and crashes even on capable hardware, alongside a 25GB install size several find bafflingly large for a game of this scope. The developer responded with a dense, nearly daily patch cadence in the weeks immediately following launch, though several performance complaints persist in reviews posted well after that patch window closed.
Biggest strengths
- The narrative and atmosphere draw enthusiastic, specific praise from reviewers with deep familiarity with the developer's catalogue, with several independently calling it the studio's best or most fully realised game to date
- The visual overhaul over the original release is repeatedly and specifically praised, with reviewers describing noticeably improved character models, environmental detail, and overall production values
- Multiple endings give the game genuine replay value, with several reviewers specifically describing satisfaction from completing every ending rather than treating a single playthrough as sufficient
Biggest weaknesses
- Performance is the single most repeated and severe complaint in the review sample, with numerous reviewers independently reporting significant stuttering, frame drops, and gameplay-breaking slowdowns even on capable hardware well above the game's likely intended requirements
- The game's install size, reported at approximately 25GB, draws specific bafflement from multiple reviewers given the game's overall scope and presentation, several questioning what the space is actually being used for
- Specific, reproducible bugs are reported beyond performance, including a camera system that reportedly breaks and prevents screen-switching, and at least one specific task-completion crash blocking further progress
Who it's for: Existing Chilla's Art fans and Japanese horror job-sim enthusiasts who want one of the studio's most fully realised narratives yet, and who have hardware capable of absorbing some real optimisation shortfalls. Less suited to players on modest PCs specifically seeking a smooth technical experience.
Our recommendation: A strong pick for horror fans already familiar with the genre and this developer's catalogue, offering a genuinely improved narrative and visual overhaul over the original. Check your hardware against the reported performance issues carefully before buying if you don't have a reasonably capable GPU.
6 / 10
Chilla's Art has built a genuinely prolific catalogue of Japanese horror job-simulators — quiet, mundane work shifts that gradually curdle into something deeply wrong — and The Bathhouse Restored Edition takes one of the studio's earlier entries and rebuilds it entirely from the ground up: new visuals, a new storyline, new mechanics, and a notably expanded cast of patrons. This review's sample draws heavily on reviewers who've followed the developer closely across many prior releases, and their verdict is unusually enthusiastic — with one significant, specific, and widely shared caveat about how the finished remake actually runs.
The studio's own fans call this a high point
Reviewers with deep familiarity with Chilla's Art's back catalogue don't hedge their praise. "By far the best chilla's to date. An IMMENSE visual update from their previous works, the longest playtime... and their most fully-realized narrative imo," one writes. Another, having played most of the studio's other releases, states plainly: "so far this is one of my favorites... completing all endings brought me a lot of joy." That's meaningful praise coming from an audience with a genuine basis for comparison — these aren't first-time players judging the game in isolation, they're longtime fans measuring it against a substantial body of the developer's own prior work and finding it holds up well.
A remake that earned trust before asking for money again
Worth noting directly: the developer offered this remake for free to anyone who already owned the original release, a specific, verifiable gesture of goodwill toward the existing fanbase rather than treating longtime supporters as a captive audience for a fresh purchase. That context matters for understanding some of the review sample's warmth — several reviewers explicitly frame their enthusiasm in terms of appreciating a developer that clearly invested real additional effort into revisiting and expanding an earlier work rather than simply re-skinning it for a second sale.
A performance problem serious enough to define the negative sample
Set against that goodwill, the single dominant complaint in this review's negative sample has nothing to do with story or design — it's raw technical performance. "It's really really really tremendously unoptimized, I got frequent massive gameplay-breaking slowdowns on my 1660ti," one reviewer writes, a complaint echoed by numerous others reporting stuttering and frame drops on hardware that should comfortably handle a game of this visual scope. The install size draws its own specific bafflement: "not to mention the game size — 25GB? What's going on here, man?" one reviewer asks, a question several others raise independently without receiving a clear answer from the game's own description or patch notes.
Specific bugs beyond raw performance
Beyond frame-rate complaints, reviewers report concrete, reproducible bugs: one describes a camera system that breaks entirely on interaction, preventing screen-switching and forcing repeated forced restarts; another reports the game crashing reliably during a specific cleaning task, blocking progress past an early point in the story. These are the kinds of specific, repeatable technical failures that go beyond ordinary launch-week jank, and they're serious enough that at least one reviewer who otherwise loves the game explicitly withheld a positive recommendation until they're addressed.
An honest note about fan bias, and this review's own read on it
At least one detailed reviewer argues the game's strong review score partly reflects a fanbase supporting the developer broadly rather than judging this specific release on its own merits, writing that positive reviewers "simply love the developers and support them in everything." This review takes that concern seriously as a general principle, but found no specific, named-source evidence of coordinated or inauthentic review activity here — the pattern described is closer to ordinary developer goodwill and brand loyalty than a documented manipulation claim, and this review treats the broader sample as a genuine reflection of audience reception rather than discounting it.
A developer that responded quickly, even if not completely
To its credit, this review can confirm Chilla's Art responded to early feedback with real urgency: ten numbered patches shipped in the month immediately following the 9 August 2024 launch, an unusually dense cadence for a small studio. A further update followed in January 2025. That's a genuine, verifiable effort to address early problems — though the persistence of performance complaints in reviews posted well after that patch window suggests the underlying optimisation issues weren't fully resolved by that initial wave of fixes.
What the achievement data adds to the completion picture
Steam's own completion figures offer a useful independent read on how far players actually get. An early milestone sits at 71.3%, showing most buyers do engage meaningfully with the opening stretch, but completion falls steadily toward the later achievements, with the rarest sitting at just 6.3%. That's a real drop-off, and it's consistent with two different explanations this review's sample supports simultaneously: some players genuinely losing interest partway through, and others being blocked outright by the specific crash and camera bugs described above rather than choosing to stop. Without more granular data this review can't separate those two causes cleanly, but the completion curve at minimum confirms that finishing every ending — the achievement most positive reviewers specifically praise reaching — remains a genuinely uncommon outcome relative to how many players start the game.
Content specificity worth naming directly
Beyond the technical concerns, at least one reviewer describes specific narrative content they found genuinely uncomfortable rather than simply unsettling in the intended horror sense, citing sexual harassment content within the story as a dealbreaker for their own recommendation. This review flags that directly for readers who may want to research the specific content further before purchasing, without independently verifying the reviewer's characterisation of that content one way or the other — it's the kind of concern best confirmed against detailed, spoiler-aware content guides rather than adjudicated in a review written without direct hands-on playtime.
Final verdict
The Bathhouse Restored Edition earns real, specific enthusiasm from Chilla's Art's own dedicated fanbase, who consistently rank it among the studio's strongest work — a meaningful endorsement given how much of that audience has a genuine basis for comparison. But a serious, widely reported performance problem, including stuttering, crashes, and a puzzlingly large install size, is a real and current barrier to recommending this without reservation, even after a dense wave of early patches. Worth playing for horror fans with capable hardware and existing goodwill toward the developer; go in cautious if your PC is on the modest side.
Pros and cons
Pros
- The narrative and atmosphere draw enthusiastic, specific praise from reviewers with deep familiarity with the developer's catalogue, with several independently calling it the studio's best or most fully realised game to date
- The visual overhaul over the original release is repeatedly and specifically praised, with reviewers describing noticeably improved character models, environmental detail, and overall production values
- Multiple endings give the game genuine replay value, with several reviewers specifically describing satisfaction from completing every ending rather than treating a single playthrough as sufficient
- The developer offered the remake for free to owners of the original release, a specific and verifiable act of goodwill toward the existing fanbase rather than treating the remake purely as a new, separate sale
- The developer shipped a dense, near-daily cluster of patches in the weeks immediately following the 9 August 2024 launch, showing real, immediate responsiveness to early bug and performance reports
Cons
- Performance is the single most repeated and severe complaint in the review sample, with numerous reviewers independently reporting significant stuttering, frame drops, and gameplay-breaking slowdowns even on capable hardware well above the game's likely intended requirements
- The game's install size, reported at approximately 25GB, draws specific bafflement from multiple reviewers given the game's overall scope and presentation, several questioning what the space is actually being used for
- Specific, reproducible bugs are reported beyond performance, including a camera system that reportedly breaks and prevents screen-switching, and at least one specific task-completion crash blocking further progress
- At least one detailed reviewer argues the "Very Positive" score partly reflects the developer's dedicated fanbase supporting the studio broadly rather than a fully objective assessment of this specific release, though this review found no named-source evidence of manipulation and treats the review sample as presented
- A specific complaint concerns content some reviewers found genuinely uncomfortable rather than merely unsettling, including at least one description of sexual harassment content within the game's narrative that soured their overall impression