Game review
Brothers - A Tale of Two Sons
6.5 / 10
- Developer
- Starbreeze Studios AB
- Publisher
- 505 Games
- Released
- 3 September 2013
- Platforms
- Windows
- Genre
- Puzzle Adventure
- Monetisation
- Paid, one-time purchase. No in-app purchases.
- Players
- Single-player only; local co-op is exclusive to the separate 2024 Remake.
The short version
Brothers - A Tale of Two Sons asks one player to simultaneously control two brothers, each on their own analog stick, as they journey to find a cure for their dying father, and its Very Positive rating across more than 16,300 reviews reflects genuine, lasting admiration for that distinctive control concept and the emotional storytelling built around it. What holds this review back is a persistent, well-documented pattern of progress-blocking bugs, including a specific issue several reviewers say has remained unfixed since at least 2014, and a directly verifiable fact this review confirmed against the game's own Steam listing: despite its twin-character premise, this original release supports only single-player, with local co-op added exclusively to a separate, newer 2024 Remake.
Biggest strengths
- A genuinely inventive dual-character control scheme, requiring the player to coordinate two brothers' movements simultaneously, widely credited as a landmark mechanical idea in the genre.
- Emotionally resonant, largely wordless storytelling that reviewers consistently describe as landing with real impact by the game's conclusion.
- Striking, varied environmental art direction, with reviewers noting each chapter looks and feels meaningfully distinct from the last.
Biggest weaknesses
- A persistent pattern of progress-blocking bugs is reported across many years of reviews, including a specific issue multiple reviewers describe as unfixed since at least 2014.
- This review confirmed directly against the game's own Steam store listing that it supports single-player only, despite its central premise being built around controlling two characters — local co-op is exclusive to the separate 2024 Remake, a distinction several reviewers say was not clear before purchase.
- Keyboard control responsiveness is a recurring specific complaint, with several reviewers reporting inputs not registering reliably during key sequences.
Who it's for: Fans of inventive, emotionally driven puzzle-adventures who want to experience a genuinely influential piece of game design history solo; players specifically wanting to share the experience with a second person should buy the 2024 Remake instead.
Our recommendation: A genuinely inventive, historically important experience worth playing solo at a discount; buy the 2024 Remake instead if you want to actually play it with someone else.
6.5 / 10
A genuinely inventive control concept, still influential
Brothers' central mechanical idea remains distinctive more than a decade after release: one player simultaneously guides two brothers, each mapped to a separate analog stick, requiring genuine coordination between the two halves of a single set of hands. "Controlling two characters at once is a great and rare concept. It's a workout for your brain. I felt mine twisted and rewired, like when you try to draw a triangle with your left hand and a circle with y[our right]," reads a 2020 review, capturing the appeal that reviewers across this base consistently credit as the game's core, lasting achievement. That inventiveness carries through to the story it enables — the two brothers' relationship and eventual, quiet resolution of their journey is frequently cited as landing with real emotional weight specifically because the control scheme itself becomes part of how that relationship is expressed mechanically, not just narratively.
A persistent, well-documented pattern of progress-blocking bugs
What tempers that praise, with real and sustained consistency, is a pattern of bugs capable of halting progress entirely. "I was enjoying the game, then the game decided it wasn't enjoying me playing it, and refused to let me progress. Apparently it's been a known bug since at least 2014, so I guess it's not getting fixed any time soon," reads a 2021 review. A 2021 review reports a similar, independent failure: "Near the end of the second chapter I hit a glitch that left me with no option but to restart the entire chapter." A separate review describes losing shared progress specifically in a co-op-style session played via screen sharing or similar workarounds: "the game bugged and would not let us continue, wasted our time since there's no way we would repeat one hour of the same thing." Checking a broad sample of negative reviews spanning close to a decade, this pattern — specific, reproducible bugs capable of blocking or reversing meaningful progress — recurs with enough consistency to treat as a genuine, long-standing reliability problem rather than isolated, hardware-specific incidents.
It's worth noting how these bugs specifically affect a short, story-driven game more severely than they would a longer, more replayable title. A game built around a tightly authored, roughly three-to-five- hour emotional arc has little slack to absorb a mid-campaign bug that forces a chapter restart or blocks further progress entirely — the interruption doesn't just cost time, it breaks the pacing and emotional momentum the writing is working hard to build. Several reviewers make exactly this point, describing genuine investment in the story right up until a bug forced them to either restart a section or abandon the game outright, which is a meaningfully worse outcome here than the same bug would represent in a longer, more forgiving game.
A directly verified single-player limitation
This review checked the game's own current Steam store listing directly and confirmed a specific, important fact: despite its premise being built entirely around controlling two characters simultaneously, this original release lists only "Single-player" under its supported features, with no local or online co-op option. That directly corroborates a specific, pointed complaint from reviewers: "This is not local co-op and I don't understand why the remake wasn't just added to our library for free like many other games do," reads a 2025 review. A separate review frames the commercial frustration even more sharply: "I like the game but the fact that there are two versions of this game and full functionality (two players mode) is available only in another version is a scam." This review takes no position on the commercial fairness of that structure, but confirms the underlying fact directly: anyone specifically wanting to share the twin-brother concept with a second player needs the separate 2024 Remake, not this original release.
Specific, recurring keyboard control complaints
A further, more technical complaint concerns keyboard responsiveness specifically. "Can't even play this game with keyboard through the chapter 1. They didn't respond to my keyboard, sometimes they did but very few moments," reads a 2013 review posted shortly after launch. A separate review echoes the same category of complaint years later, suggesting this wasn't a launch-era issue later resolved. Given the game's core mechanic already demands precise, simultaneous dual-character coordination, unreliable keyboard input compounds that challenge in a way that reads as a genuine usability problem rather than simply adding to the intended difficulty — several reviewers explicitly recommend using a controller instead for this reason.
A well-corroborated length complaint
A final, consistent complaint concerns runtime relative to price. "Too short (I completed the game with all achievements in less than 5 hours)," reads a 2022 review, a figure echoed by several other reviewers citing completion times in the two-to-three-hour range specifically. This review treats the complaint as a fair, specific value consideration — a short runtime is reasonable information for a prospective buyer to weigh against the current asking price, particularly alongside the technical reliability concerns documented above.
Final verdict
Brothers - A Tale of Two Sons remains a genuinely inventive, historically significant piece of game design whose central dual-control concept still feels distinctive more than a decade later, and this review credits that achievement without reservation. What keeps the score moderate is a persistent pattern of progress-blocking bugs spanning close to a decade of reviews, a directly verified single- player-only limitation that sits in real tension with the game's own twin-character premise, and specific, recurring keyboard control complaints. This is a worthwhile, influential solo experience at a discount; players specifically wanting to share it with a second person should buy the 2024 Remake instead, where local co-op is actually supported.
Pros and cons
Pros
- A genuinely inventive dual-character control scheme, requiring the player to coordinate two brothers' movements simultaneously, widely credited as a landmark mechanical idea in the genre.
- Emotionally resonant, largely wordless storytelling that reviewers consistently describe as landing with real impact by the game's conclusion.
- Striking, varied environmental art direction, with reviewers noting each chapter looks and feels meaningfully distinct from the last.
- A historically influential release that helped popularise emotionally driven, mechanically expressive puzzle-adventure design in the years since.
Cons
- A persistent pattern of progress-blocking bugs is reported across many years of reviews, including a specific issue multiple reviewers describe as unfixed since at least 2014.
- This review confirmed directly against the game's own Steam store listing that it supports single-player only, despite its central premise being built around controlling two characters — local co-op is exclusive to the separate 2024 Remake, a distinction several reviewers say was not clear before purchase.
- Keyboard control responsiveness is a recurring specific complaint, with several reviewers reporting inputs not registering reliably during key sequences.
- A well-corroborated length complaint describes the campaign as completable in roughly two to five hours, a short runtime some reviewers feel doesn't match the asking price.