Key art for Fable Anniversary

Game review

Fable Anniversary

6 / 10

Developer
Lionhead Studios
Publisher
Xbox Game Studios
Released
12 September 2014
Platforms
Windows
Genre
Action RPG
Monetisation
One-time purchase plus optional cosmetic DLC packs; no in-app purchases
Players
Single-player

The short version

Fable Anniversary is a genuinely beloved game — Lionhead's original choice-driven, morality- shifting action RPG still charms new and returning players alike — trapped inside a remaster that its own reviewers have criticised with striking consistency for over a decade. "Mouse" and "Lost Chapters" appear in over a third of its negative reviews between them: mouse support was never properly added for a PC release, and reviewers from 2014 through January 2026 alike recommend buying the older, cheaper Fable: The Lost Chapters instead. Performance complaints — stuttering, freezing, an awkward camera some reviewers say causes motion sickness — appear across every year of the game's Steam history, this review's own year included. A wave of renewed interest arrived in early 2026 alongside news coverage of Playground Games' upcoming Fable reboot (since delayed to 2027), and even that audience largely reached the same conclusion: this is the game to play for the story, not the definitive way to play it.

Biggest strengths

  • Widely loved as a genuinely charming, distinctive choice-driven action RPG that holds up despite its age
  • Recent English sentiment (89% over the last 100 reviews) actually runs ahead of the 85.3% lifetime score, showing the underlying game still lands with new players
  • Full controller support, and the Heroic difficulty addition gives returning fans a reason to replay

Biggest weaknesses

  • No proper mouse support for menus, inventory and the journal — a specific, heavily-repeated complaint ("mouse" appears in 44 of the 100 most-helpful negative reviews) for a native PC release
  • Widely described as a minimal, "lazy" remaster — new character models that reviewers say clash with unchanged environment art, cutscenes left at original resolution
  • Performance issues (stuttering, freezing, an awkward and reportedly motion-sickness-inducing camera) are reported consistently from 2014 through 2026

Who it's for: Fable fans and curious newcomers who want the story and world — go in expecting a rough PC port, and check whether Fable: The Lost Chapters suits you better first.

Our recommendation: The game is great; the remaster isn't. Consider the alternative first.

6 / 10

The pitch

Fable Anniversary is an HD remaster of Lionhead Studios' 2004 Fable, the original Xbox choice-driven action RPG where every decision — heroic or villainous — visibly reshapes your character's appearance and the world's opinion of you. This 2014 release brought it to PC for the first time with updated visuals, controller support and a new Heroic difficulty setting.

The game everyone agrees is good

This is the one point of near-total consensus in the review corpus, and it hasn't shifted across a decade: Fable itself is a genuinely well-loved game. Reviewers across both recommendation columns describe it as charming, funny and distinctive, and recent sentiment backs that up in the strongest possible terms — the 100 most recent English reviews run 89% positive, actually ahead of the 85.3% lifetime figure. Whatever criticism follows in this review is aimed at the port, not the game Lionhead made in 2004.

A remaster its own audience keeps calling lazy

The specific, repeated technical complaint that dominates this game's negative reviews is the lack of proper mouse support. "There is no mouse support, on a PC game, why is there no mouse support, it's a PC game, WHY DOES A PC GAME NOT HAVE MOUSE SUPPORT," reads one widely-upvoted review — and it's not an isolated frustration; "mouse" appears in 44 of the 100 most-helpful negative reviews. Alongside that, several detailed reviews describe the remaster work itself as minimal: "They put in new character models, and that's it. The animations are the same and the cutscenes were not redone," reads one; another calls the new models a mismatch with the unchanged environments, arguing they "flew in the face of the original artistic vision."

The single most distinctive pattern in this corpus is how consistently reviewers point buyers toward a different product entirely. "Lost Chapters" — referring to Fable: The Lost Chapters, the earlier, non-remastered 2005 PC port of the original — appears in 37 of the 100 most-helpful negative reviews, almost always as direct advice: "go back to the original plus Lost Chapters," "same content, better experience, and just... [cheaper]," "better to get the lost chapters version I think." That last quote is from January 2026 — this isn't a launch-week opinion that faded, it's a recommendation reviewers are still making twelve years after this remaster shipped.

Performance complaints that never fully went away

Technical issues appear across the review timeline almost every year since 2014: stuttering, random freezing, and a camera several reviewers describe as uncomfortable to the point of causing headaches or motion sickness. A July 2026 review reports being unable to get the game to launch at all beyond "a little white bar in the top left corner." This isn't evidence the game is broken for everyone — plenty of recent reviewers report a smooth experience — but the specific complaints recur too consistently across too many years to dismiss as isolated hardware issues.

Why interest picked up in early 2026

A cluster of January and February 2026 reviews explicitly frame their purchase around the newly announced Fable reboot from Playground Games: "Most of us are probably here because the new Fable was announced. I wanted to try this one to see what the series felt like back then," reads one. That reboot was originally slated for autumn 2026 before Xbox delayed it to 2027 "so it can have the dedicated moment it deserves" — worth knowing if you're one of the buyers this review's own corpus suggests are arriving here for the same reason, since the wait for the new game is now longer than it looked in January.

Value

At NZ$41.99 with optional cosmetic DLC, price complaints are real but secondary to the technical ones — reviewers are less angry about what it costs than about what they feel they're not getting for it, given how much better regarded the older Lost Chapters version is at typically a much lower price.

Verdict

Fable Anniversary sells a genuinely great game inside a remaster its own audience has criticised with unusual consistency for over a decade — no proper mouse support, minimal visual rework, and performance issues that show up in reviews from 2014 and reviews from 2026 alike. If you want to experience Fable's world and story on PC, this review's honest advice, echoing the corpus itself, is to compare it against Fable: The Lost Chapters before buying. The story is worth playing either way; this specific version isn't the only way to play it.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Widely loved as a genuinely charming, distinctive choice-driven action RPG that holds up despite its age
  • Recent English sentiment (89% over the last 100 reviews) actually runs ahead of the 85.3% lifetime score, showing the underlying game still lands with new players
  • Full controller support, and the Heroic difficulty addition gives returning fans a reason to replay
  • One-time purchase with optional cosmetic DLC; no in-app purchases

Cons

  • No proper mouse support for menus, inventory and the journal — a specific, heavily-repeated complaint ("mouse" appears in 44 of the 100 most-helpful negative reviews) for a native PC release
  • Widely described as a minimal, "lazy" remaster — new character models that reviewers say clash with unchanged environment art, cutscenes left at original resolution
  • Performance issues (stuttering, freezing, an awkward and reportedly motion-sickness-inducing camera) are reported consistently from 2014 through 2026
  • "Lost Chapters" — the earlier, non-remastered PC version — appears in 37 of the 100 most-helpful negative reviews, almost always as the recommended alternative

Category scores

Category scores are the reviewer's read on each area. They inform the overall score but do not average into it — the number at the top of the page is a judgement, not a calculation.

  • Gameplay 7.5 / 10
  • Visuals 5 / 10
  • Performance 4 / 10
  • Value 5 / 10
  • Originality 6 / 10
  • Monetisation 6 / 10
  • Story 7.5 / 10