Game review
A Case of Fraud
7 / 10
- Developer
- Hesperus Games
- Publisher
- Hesperus Games
- Released
- 10 November 2025
- Platforms
- Windows, macOS
- Genre
- Adventure / Indie
- Monetisation
- One-time purchase, no add-on content
- Players
- Single-player
The short version
A Case of Fraud is developer Hesperus Games' short, non-linear detective adventure, released 10 November 2025 for Windows and macOS, about investigating the suspicious disappearance of a startup CEO through hand-drawn documents rather than a traditional evidence hunt. Players reconstruct a fictional company's organizational chart from office memos, family photos and personnel records, piecing together identities, motives and a fraud scheme, with every named employee's pet also waiting to be correctly identified along the way. Reviewers respond enthusiastically to the puzzle design, repeatedly praising the game's hint system for letting players request help on a specific stuck point rather than a generic nudge, alongside consistent affection for the hand-drawn Procreate art and the whimsical animal-naming subplot running through the investigation.
Set against that enthusiasm, A Case of Fraud carries an Overwhelmingly Positive score shaped by a heavily repeated, specific criticism: that the game borrows directly and extensively from The Roottrees Are Dead's document-deduction formula without matching its depth or sense of discovery. Reviewers who admire the earlier game describe A Case of Fraud as competent but thin by comparison, with clues handed out at fixed milestones rather than requiring active investigation, and a runtime many completed in two to five hours. A further, independently repeated complaint concerns the mystery's resolution specifically, with reviewers describing an anticlimactic ending and a weak motive that undercuts the deduction work leading up to it.
Biggest strengths
- The core deduction puzzle draws consistent, specific praise, with reviewers describing a genuine sense of cleverness solving the org chart without the difficulty tipping into frustration
- The hint system earns standout, repeated credit for letting players request help on the exact clue they're stuck on rather than a generic nudge, with multiple reviewers hoping the approach catches on more broadly in the genre
- The hand-drawn Procreate art style earns consistent praise, with reviewers describing the presentation as charming and well suited to the game's whimsical corporate-mystery tone
Biggest weaknesses
- The single most repeated complaint argues the game borrows too heavily and too directly from The Roottrees Are Dead, with one detailed review calling it "a very shallow clone" and specifically noting even the jazzy background music echoes its influence
- A closely related, independently repeated complaint concerns the loss of active discovery, with reviewers noting evidence is handed out at fixed milestones rather than requiring the player to seek it out, reducing the investigative tension that defines the genre's best entries
- A further, independently repeated complaint concerns runtime and price, with reviewers completing the full case in two to five hours and some arguing the asking price feels high relative to that length
Who it's for: Fans of document-deduction detective games like The Roottrees Are Dead, Return of the Obra Dinn or Golden Idol looking for a shorter, more streamlined entry in the genre, particularly players who enjoy piecing together an organizational chart from scattered evidence without a demanding investigative hunt.
Our recommendation: A well-crafted, inventive short deduction puzzler with real charm in its hand-drawn presentation and hint system, worth a look for genre fans wanting a lighter, faster session, but transparent enough about its influences that players who already own and love The Roottrees Are Dead may find it feels more like an echo than an equal.
7 / 10
A vanished CEO, a stack of documents, and no hunting required
A Case of Fraud is developer Hesperus Games' short, non-linear detective adventure, released 10 November 2025 for Windows and macOS. The premise centers on Zoolingo, a seemingly successful startup building a pet-translation app, whose CEO vanishes under suspicious circumstances after landing a huge round of investor funding. Players work entirely from a collection of hand-drawn documents pulled from her home and office, memos, personnel files, family photos and internal messages, reconstructing the company's organizational chart, uncovering motives, and eventually assembling a case against whoever orchestrated the underlying fraud. True to its inspiration in deduction games like The Roottrees Are Dead, every piece of evidence needed to solve the case is provided upfront; the challenge lies entirely in reading carefully and cross-referencing details rather than in searching for hidden clues.
A puzzle design reviewers find genuinely clever
The clearest thread running through A Case of Fraud's reviews is real enthusiasm for how its deduction puzzles feel to solve. One detailed review captures that appeal directly: "The deductions are fun, the clues are plentiful, and the challenge sits in that sweet spot where you feel clever without needing to turn into Sherlock at 3 a.m." The game's hint system draws its own specific, repeated praise as a genuine design innovation, with one reviewer writing "LOVE the hint system: instead of just a generic push in the right direction, you pick exactly what you're stuck on and get a push for it specifically. I hope that catches on in general." A separate reviewer, who names their own prior work on The Roottrees Are Dead directly, still calls A Case of Fraud "a great time" with "very well designed" puzzles despite the obvious influence, while others single out the whimsical animal-identification subplot and the hand-drawn art as consistent highlights that give the corporate mystery a distinct, memorable personality of its own.
A recurring, pointed comparison to The Roottrees Are Dead
Set against that enthusiasm, A Case of Fraud's Overwhelmingly Positive score carries a heavily repeated, specific qualification: reviewers on both sides of the recommendation line describe it as deeply indebted to The Roottrees Are Dead, and a meaningful share argue it doesn't do enough with that inheritance. One of the corpus's more pointed critical reviews states the comparison bluntly: "It's a very shallow clone of The Roottrees Are Dead, even down to copying the jazzy background music... A game like this needs more meat on its bones (and less ripping off) for it to be worth recommending." A separate, more measured review reaches a similar conclusion from a place of real affection for the genre: "It takes a lot from the Roottrees, but doesn't add much, if at all. The UI is a bit worse and there's less content." Even reviewers who ultimately recommend the game tend to frame it in exactly these terms, describing it as "short and sweet" and "a bit simpler than Roottrees or Obra Dinn," suggesting the corpus's overwhelmingly positive tone reflects enjoyment of a well-executed, lower-stakes riff rather than any sense that A Case of Fraud has carved out fully independent territory within its genre.
A short case with an ending some found underwhelming
A further, independently repeated complaint concerns how A Case of Fraud resolves its central mystery. One reviewer sums up the issue plainly: "the ending just felt super anticlimactic and seemingly ignores a lot of the story set up," while a separate detailed review agrees the presentation and reading experience were strong overall but "the ultimate solution to who committed the murder and fraud was weak - the motive for fraud was weak, and the motive for murder didn't exist." That criticism sits alongside a related, more practical complaint about length, with several reviewers completing the entire case in two to five hours and questioning whether the asking price matches that runtime, even as the same reviewers frequently note they enjoyed the time they spent with it.
A genre still finding its own name
Several of A Case of Fraud's more detailed reviews spend as much time discussing the shape of its emerging genre as the game itself, a small but telling sign of how new this specific style of deduction game still is. One reviewer jokes about the lack of settled terminology directly: "We need to come up with good name for this genre. Genealogical games? Label-likes?" before praising A Case of Fraud for accomplishing "everything it sets out to do and does so quite well," even while noting it stays deliberately smaller in scope than Roottrees or Obra Dinn. That framing matters for reading the corpus's harsher comparisons fairly: a genre without an established name or a long list of entries inevitably measures every newcomer against whichever title defined it first, and much of A Case of Fraud's criticism reads less like a judgment against the game on its own terms than a reflection of how few true peers it currently has to be judged against instead.
Streamlined by design, not by accident
A separate detailed review makes the case that A Case of Fraud's leaner structure reflects a deliberate design choice rather than a shortfall, describing it as "quite a lot more streamlined with less research and fewer fields to fill, and faster as a result," noting that jobs are automatically filled in, family members are largely excluded outside the tutorial, and each character has only one valid photo to place rather than several near-identical options to sort through. Read that way, the game's shorter runtime and reduced investigative friction look less like missing content than a conscious bet on pace over depth, one that a meaningful share of the review corpus appreciates specifically because it respects a player's time, even as an equally vocal share wishes it had kept more of the genre's slower, more exploratory pleasures intact.
Value
At NZ$12.99, A Case of Fraud asks a moderate price for a short deduction puzzler whose Overwhelmingly Positive score, 531 positive against 15 negative across 546 reviews, reflects genuine, specific enthusiasm for its clever puzzle design, standout hint system and charming hand-drawn presentation, tempered by a heavily repeated acknowledgment that it leans directly on The Roottrees Are Dead without fully matching that game's depth or payoff. For fans of the document-deduction genre looking for a lighter, faster case to work through, A Case of Fraud already delivers a well-crafted couple of hours; for players who already own and love its more demanding influences, the current review corpus suggests treating it as a pleasant echo rather than an essential new entry in the genre.
Pros and cons
Pros
- The core deduction puzzle draws consistent, specific praise, with reviewers describing a genuine sense of cleverness solving the org chart without the difficulty tipping into frustration
- The hint system earns standout, repeated credit for letting players request help on the exact clue they're stuck on rather than a generic nudge, with multiple reviewers hoping the approach catches on more broadly in the genre
- The hand-drawn Procreate art style earns consistent praise, with reviewers describing the presentation as charming and well suited to the game's whimsical corporate-mystery tone
- The subplot of identifying each employee's pet draws specific, repeated affection, adding a lighter, memorable hook to an otherwise straightforward corporate fraud investigation
- Several reviewers specifically praise the game's setting in New Zealand, noting genuine appreciation for a detective story set somewhere other than a generic or American backdrop
Cons
- The single most repeated complaint argues the game borrows too heavily and too directly from The Roottrees Are Dead, with one detailed review calling it "a very shallow clone" and specifically noting even the jazzy background music echoes its influence
- A closely related, independently repeated complaint concerns the loss of active discovery, with reviewers noting evidence is handed out at fixed milestones rather than requiring the player to seek it out, reducing the investigative tension that defines the genre's best entries
- A further, independently repeated complaint concerns runtime and price, with reviewers completing the full case in two to five hours and some arguing the asking price feels high relative to that length
- A specific complaint concerns the ending, with multiple reviewers describing an anticlimactic resolution and a weak motive for both the fraud and the underlying mystery
- A smaller, more technical complaint concerns a specific interface limitation, with one detailed review noting players can't assign the same picture to two different chart slots without manually removing it from the first